By comparison, the cover screen on the Galaxy Z Fold, located on the lower half of the phone, is distinctly smaller. For specific numbers, scroll down to the bottom of the page for a side-by-side specs chart. Under the hood, the Razr Plus is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Mobile chipset that’s backed up by 8GB of RAM and 256GB storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 comes equipped with that same chipset, paired with 8GB of RAM and storage options ranging from 128GB to 512GB.
Motorola Razr (2023) vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4: Which should you buy?
The new Motorola Razr is the latest offering that ain’t to strike a balance between flagship features and an accessible price tag. And while Samsung has had its eye on making foldables more affordable with the Galaxy Z Flip lineup, it seems Motorola has finally cracked the code. Why you can trust Android Central Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. On the other hand, Motorola goes for a more rounded design with vegan leather covering a large portion of the rear panels.
While some might prefer the rounded edges and feel of the vegan leather on the Razr, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 benefits from Samsung’s bevy of color options, particularly with the Bespoke editions. The Razr only has three color options to choose from, including Sage Green, Summer Lilac, and Vanilla Cream, which admittedly look as good as they sound.
The phones both feature water resistance, but the Razr has a more protective IPX8 rating, meaning it’s better equipped for accidental spills. Both devices have large internal displays with Full HD+ resolution and 22:9 aspect ratios, making them quite tall.
The Razr display is a bit bigger at 6.9-inches, and it has a smoother 144Hz refresh rate compared to the 120Hz panel on the Flip 4, but the Galaxy has a larger cover screen on the back panel, measuring 1.9-inches versus the 1.5-inch cover screen on the Razr. Creases are present on both displays, but the Razr is likely much less pronounced due to the teardrop hinge design, which has been tested to last at least 400,000 folds.
The Galaxy Z Flip 4 cover screen gives users more room to view notifications and interact with widgets. Meanwhile, the Razr cover display is really only good for checking notifications and viewing widgets in a limited manner.
While it wasn’t a widely used chipset, it still offers plenty of punch and should be sufficient in providing a flagship-like experience. Swipe to scroll horizontally Category Motorola Razr/Razr 40 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 OS Android 13 (My UX) Android 12, upgradeable to Android 13 (One UI 5) Display (internal) 6.9-inch, pOLED, FHD+ (2640 x 1080), 144Hz LTPO, 1400 nits, 22:9 6.7-inch, AMOLED 2X, FHD+ (2600 x 1080), 120Hz LTPO, 1200 nits, 22:9 Display (external) 1.5-inch, pOLED, 196 x 368 60Hz, 1000 nits 1.9-inch, OLED, 512 x 260, 60Hz Chipset Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 RAM 8GB LPDDR4X 8GB LPDDR5 Storage 128GB, 256GB, USF 2.2 128GB/256GB/512GB UFS 3.1 Audio 3 mics, stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos Stereo sound, Samsung Scalable hi-res codec Connectivity 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC Security Fingerprint sensor Fingerprint sensor Protection IP52, Gorilla Glass Victus IPX8, Gorilla Glass Victus+ Battery 4200mAh, 30W wired charging, 5W wireless 3700mAh, 25W wired charging, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse-wireless charging Dimensions (open) 170.82 x 73.95 x 7.35mm 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9mm Dimensions (closed) 88.24 x 73.95 x 15.8mm 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1mm Weight 188.6g 187g Colors Summer Lilac, Sage Green, Vanilla Cream Bora Purple, Pink Gold, Blue, Black, Yellow, White Motorola claims over 30 hours on a single charge, but we’ve yet to test out the Razr to see just what battery life is like. Samsung uses One UI, which isn’t as popular, but has matured well for foldables, and the company updates its phones very often, unlike Motorola.
The cameras on clamshell foldables aren’t anything to run home about, and the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is no exception. The Razr also sports a 64MP primary camera sensor, which sounds like it might have the upper hand on image quality.
Unfortunately, the phone is only capable of 4K30 video on all of its rear cameras, missing out on the 60fps recording found on the Galaxy Z Flip 4’s primary sensor. Samsung has enough experience with foldables that the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is a safe bet if you’re looking for a flip-style phone. And while we don’t have a price or release date for North America, there’s no doubt it’ll be the cheapest new foldable on the market.
It may have a smaller cover screen, but it makes up for it with an impressive internal display and a stylish vegan leather finish.
Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4: Which foldable flip phone wins?
Things are taking a fun turn in the world of foldables as illustrated by our Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 face-off. There’s no denying that the two foldables offer an attractive package for their unique folding abilities and features, proving to us that they’re the future — and more importantly, phones are fun once again.
After spending months using the Galaxy Z Flip 4, I’ve only recently made the switch to the Razr+ to see how it stacks up against one of the best foldable phones around.
Honestly, it’s a close call because there are several things I love about both phones, but as you’ll see in my Motorola Razr+ vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 comparison, it was ultimately the one with the most utility that came out on top No No Rear cameras 12MP main (f/1.5), 13MP ultrawide (f/2.2) 12MP main (f/1.8), 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2) Front cameras 32MP (f/2.4) 10MP (f/2.4) Battery size 3,800 mAh 3,700 mAh Battery life (Hrs:Mins) 10:09 8:59 Charging speed 30W wired, 5W wireless 25W wired; 10W wireless Size 6.7 x 2.9 x 0.27 inches (open), 3.48 x 2.9 x 0.59 inches (closed) 2.8 x 6.5 x 0.27 inches (71.9 x 165.2 x 6.9mm) Weight 6.63 ounces 6.5 ounces Colors Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta Blue, Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold It’s not to say that the Galaxy Z Flip 4 isn’t attractive, especially when you can customize the paint job with the Bespoke edition of Samsung’s phone.
This adds a tremendous amount of utility, partly because I was able to run apps on the external display — while giving me better framing when capturing selfies with the rear cameras. Sure, I found it useful to quickly access things without opening the phone, but the tiny space limited them to notifications and widgets.
Apart from the greenish color tones produced by the Motorola Razr+, there wasn’t a substantial difference between either phone’s output when shooting in ideal conditions. As you can see in the shot above, there’s just a greenish hue with the capture from the Motorola Razr+, making it unrealistic when compared to the more natural color tones of the Galaxy Z Flip 4. While I don’t consider either phone to specialize in low light, it’s hard to overlook the brighter, more exposed images captured by the Galaxy Z Flip 4; the Razr+ shots are darker and lack fine details. The Razr+’s shortcomings were more profound when I switched to their respective night modes, which required both phones to stay as still as possible to draw in more light.
You can easily see above how the Galaxy Z Flip 4’s night mode made the scene brighter, allowing more details to come out in the shadows. Strangely enough, I prefer the 4K video recording performance out of the Motorola Razr+ for the simple fact that footage from the Galaxy Z Flip 4 was over-sharpened. Being a videographer, I do like how there are manual video controls with the Galaxy Z Flip 4 to adjust parameters like the shutter speed, exposure compensation, and ISO. The Razr+ achieved average score of 1,320 and 4,134 respectively on GeekBench 5’s single-core and multicore tests, while the Galaxy Z Flip 4 pulled in similar numbers at 1,291 and 4,015.
They showed similar results with other basic functions, such as navigating around the interface, playing graphically intensive games, and the occasional web surfing. The Motorola Razr+ technically has the faster refresh rate of 165Hz, versus 120Hz on the Galaxy Z Flip 4, but the performance was indistinguishable to my eyes.
Our own custom benchmark tests also revealed a win for the Razr+, since it lasted 10 hours and 9 minutes when tasked with surfing the web continuously over cellular. You’ll like how the interfaces are as minimalist as they get, so there aren’t a lot of redundant customizations and features thrown on top of stock Android.
You’re basically able to do everything in Android using the main display, but on the smaller external one — allowing me to check my notifications, send out replies to messages, scroll through some of my favorite apps, and yes, even playing some games.
You’ll only be able to see notifications, access a few widgets, and take photos with the cover screen of the Galaxy Z Flip 4, which is why Motorola has the upper hand here. Furthermore, I also appreciate the other gestures that Motorola has continued to implement in its Android phones, like turning on the flashlight with ease by performing a double chopping motion with the Razr+. Adding to this, there are a lot more personalization options at my disposal to make the external screen of the Razr+ more exciting with its dynamic wallpapers, clock faces, and much more.
After two chances at trying to convince the world that the Razr line is a worthy contender, I’m happy to report that the Motorola Razr+ is finally the device we need in the foldable space.
Motorola Razr Plus vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4
This article is part of our series Battle of the Brands, in which we compare category-leading products to their counterparts to determine which are actually worth your money. Samsung includes a 1.9-inch cover display that can show you small widgets and notifications, and act as a miniature camera viewfinder for taking selfies. Motorola lets you run any app installed on your phone, which means you can fire up everything from Google Maps and Gmail to YouTube and — yes — Call of Duty. I cannot stop checking my email, managing my to-do list and playing Stack Bounce on this thing.
TL;DR: The Z Flip 4’s 1.9-inch cover screen is no match for the Razr+’s 3.6-inch display, which can do everything from show you media controls to open full-fledged apps. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 ships with a 6.7-inch 2640 x 1080 Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz refresh rate and 1,200 nits of peak brightness.
You get more room to play games, watch movies and read your favorite ebooks on the Razr+, in addition to a smoother and brighter experience. TL;DR: While both the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Razr+ have nice screens, the Razr+’s is slightly nicer with its larger size, faster refresh rate and higher brightness.
The Razr+ loses its signature chin for a uniform bezel around the display, bringing it in line with the design language Samsung has been following since the inception of the Z Flip series. You’ve got power and volume buttons on the sides of each device, a USB-C port on the bottom, stereo speakers (which are about the same quality) and a right-mounted fingerprint scanner. Both devices include the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 processor, a tried-and-true chipset with excellent performance and efficiency. I found that both phones offered enough horsepower to handle my everyday workload whether I was typing out tweets, checking emails, nervously scrolling through Slack to make sure I didn’t miss anything important or playing a graphics-heavy game.
The Razr+ is technically faster at 30W over USB-C versus 25W on the Z Flip 4, while wireless charging maxes out at 15W on Samsung’s phone and only 5W on Motorola’s. TL;DR: You won’t notice much difference when it comes to performance and battery life on the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Razr+, which is a good thing since they’re both very powerful. I don’t mind the two rear sensors on the Razr+; the primary 12MP f/1.5 lens can take some nice photos in good lighting conditions, while the 13MP f/2.2 ultra-wide is convenient to have when you want to fit more of a scene in a frame. But from photo and video quality to image processing and color tuning, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is more capable of capturing something you’ll enjoy looking at. The device’s main 12MP lens might not have as large an aperture as the Razr+ at f/1.8, but it takes nicer-quality photos in practically every setting. I’m never encouraged to shoot with the Razr+ because of how bad its video quality is; even at 4K and 60 frames per second, footage can come out choppy with strange artifacting in tricky lighting, while colors all have a weird sharpness to them.
Samsung has been making great software for years with its revamped One UI skin on top of Android, and that experience carries over to the Galaxy Z Flip 4. It’s also a lot friendlier to multitaskers with features like split-screen, floating app windows and Samsung’s signature Edge panel.
The company’s My UX skin feels like next to nothing on top of Android, save for a few UI tweaks here and there. The home screen is almost identical to that of a Google Pixel phone, and everything from the iconography to the quick settings menu will feel familiar to anyone who’s used a near-stock version of Android.
Motorola also throws in a few of its signature features thanks to the bundled Moto app; you can double-chop to activate the flashlight, double-twist your wrist to open the camera, swipe with three fingers to take a screenshot and glance at your notifications with Peek Display. TL;DR: Both phones have excellent software experiences with good update schedules, and it comes down to whether you want something simpler or a more robust feature set.
Samsung will almost certainly be taking the wraps off it at its Unpacked event sometime in July, and it’s expected to compete with the Razr+ on a more direct level with a bigger cover screen and better cameras.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs. Motorola Razr 2022: Which foldable phone could win?
Meanwhile Motorola’s done a lot to upgrade the Razr 2022 from its lackluster predecessors, but is the one that has to prove it has what it takes to beat Samsung, the current king of the best foldable phones. One of the breakthrough features with the Galaxy Z Flip 3 a year ago was that Samsung managed to drop the starting price below the $1,000 threshold.
As noted, both phones open up to reveal a 6.7-inch main screen, with resolution a little bit sharper on the Galaxy Z Flip 4.
Both phones support fast refresh rates for their interior displays, though the Motorola Razr can hit 144Hz.
The refresh rate on the Galaxy Z Flip 4 tops out at 120Hz, though it can also scale down to 1Hz when the on-screen action is more static to preserve battery life. The selfie cam comparison is similarly tilted in the Razr’s favor, with a 32MP front camera compared to 10MP shooter on the Galaxy Z Flip 4’s display. When reviewing the Galaxy Z Flip 4, we took many pictures with that device’s cameras, and the results were solid, particularly in low-light settings. The Galaxy Z Flip 4 cameras do tend to overly saturate the colors on photos, so there’s an area where the Razr 2022 could challenge Samsung’s device.
Previous versions of the Razr used more modest chipsets, but with the 2022 edition, Motorola has opted for the best system-on-chip Qualcomm has to offer.
We haven’t had a chance to test the Motorola Razr 2022 yet, but we’d expect strong performance given our experience using the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1-powered Galaxy Z Flip 4.
And while the A15 Bionic powering Apple’s iPhone 13 lineup remains the fastest mobile processor we’ve tested, the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 inside the Galaxy Z Flip 4 manages to bite into that lead a little. You’d expect the Motorola Razr 2022 to match the Z Flip 4’s performance — it is the same chipset, after all — though there’s a chance of seeing some better results with multitasking.
Foldable phones have never blown us away with their battery life, so we’re eager to see how the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Motorola Razr 2022 compare, especially since efficient power management has been one of the marquee features for the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 chipset in both devices. Previous face-offs between the foldable flip phones of Samsung and Motorola haven’t been much of a contest, as older Razrs came with less powerful processors and less impressive specs.
Motorola Razr Plus vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4: Which foldable should you buy?
Like Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip series, Motorola has gone with the clamshell approach to foldables, prioritizing portability and ease of use over high performance and endurance. Motorola Razr Plus Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 Display 6.9-inch POLED with 165Hz 6.7-inch AMOLED with 120Hz Weight 184.5g 187g Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 RAM/Storage 8GB with 256GB 8GB with 128GB/256GB/512GB Battery 3,800mAh with 30W charging and 5W wireless 3,700mAh with 30W charging and 10W wireless Camera 12MP wide, 13MP ultra-wide, 32MP front For as long as I could remember, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip model has faced the issue of having too small of an external screen.
With the Motorola Razr Plus, the company has not only embedded a larger panel on the front but it refreshes at 144Hz, nearing the visual quality of the unfolded display beneath it. Motorola put some thought into the software of the external display, too, letting users personalize their own “panels” of widgets, apps, and games. If you enjoy watching movies and shows, mindlessly scrolling through social media, or both, then the Motorola Razr Plus is the better medium of the two.
It’s the same hue that won Pantone’s Color of the Year and has slowly but surely made its way across Motorola’s other mobile devices. Besides the blend of red and pink, the Viva Magenta finish comes in vegan leather material, making the Razr Plus very comfortable to hold.
Since release, Samsung has not only been able to refine and apply any necessary bug fixes to the Galaxy Z Flip 4, but the model has also dropped in price as demand has declined post-launch.
As a result, you can buy find a Galaxy Z Flip 4 on the market for as low as $500 right now, $500 less than its retail price and what Moto is charging for the Razr Plus ($999).
Not to mention, the Galaxy Z Flip is available in more major carrier stores, including Verizon, so discounts via installment plans are easier to come by. By comparison, the Motorola Razr Plus only has an IP52 rating, meaning it can sustain “direct sprays of water up to 15 degrees from the vertical”, according to Rainford Solutions.
Viva Magenta is hard to top, but if you’d like to customize your flippable down to the color of the hinge, then Samsung will give you that freedom with its Bespoke program for the Galaxy Z Flip 4.
Motorola Razr Plus vs. Galaxy Z Flip 4: which is the best flip phone?
Motorola Razr Plus Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 Size Unfolded: 170.8 x 74 x 7mm (6.7 x 2.9 x 0.27 inches) Folded: 88.4 x 74 x 15.1mm (3.4 x 2.9 x 0.59 inches) Unfolded: 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9mm (6.5 x 2.8 x 0.27 inches) Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1mm (3.3 x 2.8 x 0.62-0.67 inches) Weight 188.5 grams (6.53 ounces) 187 grams (6.6 ounces) Screen size Cover screen: 3.8 inch AMOLED Inner screen: 6.9 inch AMOLED Cover screen: 1.9 inch AMOLED Inner screen: 6.7 inch AMOLED Screen resolution Cover screen: 1056 x 1066 pixels (413 pixels per inch), 144Hz Inner screen: 1080 x 2640 pixels (413 pixels per inch), 165Hz Cover screen: 260 x 512 pixels Inner screen: 1080 x 2640 pixels (426 pixels per inch), 120Hz Operating system Android 13 Android 13 Storage 256GB, 512GB 128GB, 256GB, 512GB MicroSD card slot No No Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 RAM 8GB, 12GB 8GB Camera Dual lens 12MP wide, 13MP ultrawide rear, 32MP front Dual lens 12MP wide, 12MP ultrawide rear, 10MP front Video Up to 4K at 60 frames per second (fps) Up to 4K at 60 frames per second (fps) Bluetooth version Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.2 Ports USB-C 2.0 USB-C 2.0 Fingerprint sensor Yes, embedded in the power button Yes, side-mounted Water resistance IP52 IPX8 Battery 3,800mAh battery 30W wired charging 5W wireless charging 3,700mAh battery 25W wired charging 15W wireless charging 4.5W reverse wireless charging App marketplace Google Play Store Google Play Store Network support Most major carriers Most major carriers Colors Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red Price Starting at $999 Starting at $999 Buy from Most major retailers Most major retailers Review Motorola Razr Plus review Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review While the Razr Plus and the Galaxy Z Flip 4 are relatively similar smartphones in terms of their overall design, they greatly differ when it comes to their cover displays. The Razr Plus has a 3.8-inch AMOLED screen that covers nearly its entire front, allowing the phone to be used without even having to unfold it. The Flip 4’s cover screen is essentially a small 1.9-inch window that’s really only used as a notification center and clock.
The screens on both devices are certainly impressive, but the Razr Plus is a little bit more cutting-edge on account of it being nearly a year newer than the Flip 4. The Flip 4, on the other hand, has a small gap near its hinge when folded which can be irritating and make the phone feel bulkier than the Razr Plus as a result. The Razr Plus has an ingress protection rating of IP52, which essentially means that it’s safe from dust and other solid particles like sand and can survive water splashes or a few raindrops. Neither the Razr Plus nor the Galaxy Z Flip 4 have camera arrays that are as impressive as other smartphones in their price range. While they may seem solid on paper, in practice, the phones don’t perform as well as other, similarly priced devices. The Razr Plus has a dual-camera array on its cover screen: a 12MP main lens and a 13MP ultrawide shooter.
They’ll certainly get the job done for most people, but they don’t produce images that are as stunning as other, similarly priced smartphones that have nicer cameras. You can compare the image quality yourself using the photos above, but if you ask us, we give the Galaxy Z Flip 4 the upper hand.
Samsung promises that Flip 4 will get four Android OS updates and five years of security support. As nice as the features exclusive to the Z Flip 4 are, they just aren’t as convenient as the ability to use the Razr Plus’ cover screen the same as if it were fully unfolded. The convenience of being able to send texts, use Google Maps, watch videos, and more with a palm-sized screen is a revolutionary feature that seems to be influencing the design of the Galaxy Z Flip 5. While the Razr Plus isn’t exactly leagues above the Flip 4 when it comes to its technical specs or cameras, its user experience is far better-designed thanks to the cover screen. Take note that some of that is due to the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip 4 is nearly a year old at this point, meaning that the Razr Plus had a lot more time to get more right.
Be First to Comment