I manage to get 8 hrs of constant use from my pixel 6a, a mix of browsing through social media, playing heavy games and watching netflix series.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2100: What is the difference?
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✔ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 ✔ Samsung Exynos 2100 Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. (Samsung Exynos 2100) When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. (Samsung Exynos 2100) A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance. (Samsung Exynos 2100) A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
(Samsung Exynos 2100) The clock multiplier controls the speed of the CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (Snapdragon)
Specification Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Samsung Galaxy S21 FE (Snapdragon) Display 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixels, 120 Hz 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixels, 120 Hz OS Android v11 Android v11 Battery 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery Internal Memory 128 GB 256 GB CPU 2.9 GHz, Octa Core Processor 2.84 GHz, Octa Core Processor Price ₹33,489 ₹33,880
Galaxy S21’s Snapdragon 888 vs Exynos 2100 features, performance, and battery life
Qualcomm announced the 888 at its Snapdragon Tech Summit keynote back in December, paving the way for an onslaught of Samsung, LG, OnePlus, Sony, and other flagships phones with it as soon as January, starting with the Galaxy S21 Samsung, on the other hand, just detailed the Exynos 2100 with a dedicated unveiling event for the first time, sporting Cortex-X1 cores with peak 2.9GHz frequency, 5G integration, and a modern 5nm EUV production method.
With identical hardware save for the different chipsets, the Snapdragon 888 version of the Galaxy S21 Ultra that we get in the US, and the global Exynos 2100 one should be pretty comparable in terms of battery life given that they are both built on the latest 5nm process, right?
Well, sort of, as we found the Exynos lacking bigly in the gaming endurance department, due to its off-the-shelf graphics subsystem that is less flexible in performance and power draw than Qualcomm’s custom-built Adreno GPU.
While the Exynos 2100 is a huge upgrade over the performance per power draw unit score that its predecessor in the S20 series had, it still has some catching up to do when it comes to the Snapdragon 888, especially in the graphics subsystem realm. While the Exynos 2100 is a huge upgrade over the performance per power draw unit score that its predecessor in the S20 series had, it still has some catching up to do when it comes to the Snapdragon 888, especially in the graphics subsystem realm.
One thing is for sure – playing 120fps-enabled games on your Galaxy S21 Ultra in the default adaptive refresh mode will decimate your battery life in no time flat, regardless of whether you have the Snapdragon 888 or Exynos 2100 models.
Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 888: Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra sustained performance and throttling test
Our in-depth look at the differences between the US and International versions of the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is slowly turning into a regular editorial series. Today, in yet another edition of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs. Exynos 2100, we are taking a closer look at sustained chipset performance and thermal throttling. After initially exploring the difference in benchmark performance between the two chips inside an otherwise identical Galaxy S21 Ultra unit, we then moved on to compare overall battery endurance. Even so, most of your really passionate comments on the matter kept circling back to the topics of thermal throttling and sustained performance in the ongoing debate on which is the superior chip.
We have looked into the matter in-depth in the past and CPU cores remain the single most significant heat source in a chipset, with the GPU hardly contributing in comparison. Looking at the graphs themselves, we can’t help but notice that the two variants seem to take a slightly different approach to their performance curve, likely down to some CPU governor tuning.
However, there is also another way of looking at this – the Exynos chip can sustain its peak performance for far shorter periods and is forced to start ramping-down due to thermal constraints earlier. Overall, as far as the CPU Throttling test app is concerned, it seems like the Exynos is struggling quite a bit more than its Snapdragon counterpart while also maintaining slightly lower scores overall.
A more important aspect when analyzing today’s test is the amount of performance the Exynos loses over time, compared to the much better-sustained curve on the Snapdragon.
In a theoretical parallel setup, where the Exynos has better CPU core thermal management, we wouldn’t be surprised to see the Mali-G78 MP14 with a notable, or at least measurable lead instead.
As things currently stand, though, in a more GPU-heavy workload situation, both the Snapdragon 888 and the Exynos 2100 versions of the Galaxy S21 Ultra remain very, very comparable in terms of performance. Well, at the end of the day, this entire debate is still a purely academic one, held out of curiosity, since in practical terms, we still maintain that the two chips, as found in the two variants of the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, deliver a very comparable experience.
Be First to Comment